Crimes against liberty: kidnapping, threats and coercion
Crimes against liberty: kidnapping, threats and coercion
What distinguishes a threat from coercion? And from kidnapping?
Threats
Threats are characterized by the announcement of a harm to be inflicted in the near future, though not immediately. The offense of threats arises when such conduct interferes with the formation of the will of the victim, thereby undermining their freedom of action.
Coercion
By contrast, in the offense of coercion, the harm is imminent. The effect directly and immediately impacts the victim’s freedom. The key distinction between a threat and coercion lies in the immediacy of the harm announced.
Unlawful Detention or Kidnapping
In cases of unlawful detention or kidnapping, the decisive element is the intent to deprive the victim of liberty. Mere awareness of the act suffices. The motive for the unlawful detention is legally irrelevant, and the offense is consummated at the very moment of detention or confinement, persisting until the victim is released.
What circumstances may lead to a reduction of the penalty?
- Spontaneous Repentance:
A mitigation of the penalty may apply where the victim is released within the first three days of detention without the perpetrator having achieved their objective. The law recognizes a form of spontaneous repentance. It is not strictly necessary for the perpetrator to physically release the detainee; rather, acts that facilitate release may suffice. Jurisprudence has interpreted circumstances such as the perpetrator falling asleep or the immediate and secure presence of third parties as conduct aimed at liberation. - Intervention of Third Parties:
Where release is effected by third parties not involved in the offense, by the victim’s own ability to escape, or by police intervention, such circumstances do not qualify as mitigating conduct. However, in cases where it is evident that the detention was not intended to last more than 72 hours, or where the perpetrator’s intention did not include a prolonged deprivation of liberty, a reduction in penalty may be applicable. - Conditions for Mitigation:
For mitigation to apply, it must be the perpetrator who releases the detainee within three days. If the detention serves no other purpose than the deprivation of liberty itself, there should be no obstacle to applying mitigation. Nevertheless, where the detention was carried out with motives of revenge, threats, or extortion, mitigation is excluded, even if the victim is subsequently released.
We Can Help
At Fukuro Legal, we provide expert legal advice in cases of threats, coercion, and kidnapping. If you require legal assistance, we are here to help you defend your rights.
For immediate legal assistance, contact us. Our team of criminal defense attorneys is ready to provide you with a consultation and help you understand your legal options.
Frequently asked questions
Criminal matters are complex and often time-sensitive. If you need further clarification or legal guidance, our criminal lawyers can evaluate your case and advise you accordingly.
Still have questions?
Cases involving allegations of kidnapping, threats, or coercion require a precise assessment of both the facts and the legal classification under Spanish criminal law. When criminal proceedings are initiated, early advice from a criminal defense lawyer based in Madrid allows a proper review of the charges, evidentiary issues, and procedural guarantees. In situations involving detention or expedited proceedings, timely access to legal defense is essential to ensure that fundamental rights are respected from the outset.
What is the difference between kidnapping and unlawful detention?
Kidnapping involves detaining a person with additional aggravating factors, such as demanding conditions or prolonging the detention. Unlawful detention refers to depriving someone of their liberty without legal justification. The distinction depends on the circumstances and duration of the deprivation.
Can threats constitute a criminal offense even if no harm occurs?
Yes. Under Spanish law, serious threats may constitute a criminal offense even if they are not carried out. The relevance depends on the nature of the threat, its credibility, and whether it was intended to cause fear or compel behavior.
Is intent required for these offenses?
Yes. These crimes generally require intent. The prosecution must show that the accused knowingly and deliberately restricted another person’s liberty or acted with the purpose of threatening or coercing them. Accidental or negligent conduct does not meet this threshold.
What penalties may apply if there is a conviction?
Penalties vary depending on the offense and the specific circumstances, such as duration, severity, and the victim’s situation. They may include imprisonment and will result in a criminal record. Sentencing is determined within the limits set by the Criminal Code.
Can these offenses be committed through digital or indirect means?
Yes. Threats and coercion may be carried out through messages, phone calls, or other indirect means. Courts assess the content, context, and impact of the communication when determining criminal liability.
Why is early legal assistance important in these cases?
Early legal advice allows a prompt evaluation of the facts, the legality of the charges, and the available procedural safeguards. In this context, guidance from a criminal defense lawyer in Madrid is often decisive in protecting the rights of the person under investigation.
Liberty Crimes Defense Lawyer
Specialized criminal defense for threats, coercion, unlawful detention. Expert representation in kidnapping, ransom cases. Strategic legal counsel on immediacy, spontaneous repentance, mitigation factors under Spanish law.
The best criminal lawyers
Get to know the people behind Fukuro Legal — lawyers committed to strategic, high-level defense.
Premium service.
Trusted by our clients
Our clients trust us for effective representation and support in their criminal cases. Their testimonials highlight our commitment to protecting their rights and achieving the best outcomes.
Contact Us
Contact our criminal defense attorneys. The firm offers immediate action in any emergency situation.